| Source file | Birmingham Resource Portal |
| Tab used | Pricing Summary |
| Tabs in workbook | Requirements, SW Pricing, Pricing Summary |
| File modified | 2025-10-06T17:19:00.524Z |
| Documents snapshot | propshop-archive/drive snapshot 2026-09-03 |
Extractor confidence
Fields the extractor could not find
non_opportunity_reasonmo_valuewarranty_valuesaas_valuethird_party_valueduration_months_ddiduration_months_mocontract_term_monthscounties_or_officesprimetotal_person_monthshours_basis_per_month
Extraction notes
This is an early client-facing draft ('Working Estimates (for discussion only)'), not a submitted bid. Row 11-14 of Pricing Summary has an unlabeled staffing-like table (Developers/Testers/BA/PM with count, a numeric column, and price) but column headers are missing/ambiguous, so role-level fte_months/bill_rate were left null rather than guessed; only the named roles and aggregate prices are captured as free text in this note: Developers 8 @ price 215040; Testers 2 @ 46080; BA 1 @ 28800; Project Manager 1 @ 28800 (basis of the 3rd numeric column unclear — could be hourly rate or month count, not stated). Budget context text mentions '~9% of $20M EDA grant (~$1.85M over 5 years)' matching the $1.94M total order of magnitude.