Explorer · record · dc-oag-child-support-enforcement-system-replacement-project-july-2026

DC - OAG - Child Support Enforcement System Replacement Project - July 2026

DC OAG (Office of the Attorney General), Child Support Services Division (CSSD) · DC Child Support Enforcement System (DCCSES) Replacement · District of Columbia

Identity & commercials

source facts
JurisdictionDistrict of Columbia
Jurisdiction typestate
AgencyDC OAG (Office of the Attorney General), Child Support Services Division (CSSD)
SystemDC Child Support Enforcement System (DCCSES) Replacement
DomainChild Support Enforcement
Bid dateJul 2026
Basisbid
Total contract value$46,100,084
DDI value$32,579,632
M&O value$13,520,452
DDI duration (months)24
Total term (months)Not available in source data
Total person-months1,443
Effort basisbid
Users6,250
CountiesNot available in source data
PrimeCardinality
SubcontractorsNot available in source data
HostingNot available in source data

Documents in the Drive folder

1 file · snapshot

Staffing by role

21 roles
RoleLocationPerson-monthsBill rate
Executive Sponsor / Account ManagerUS27$174
Project Manager*US51$130
Functional Lead*US24$130
Technical Lead*US24$130
OCM LeadUS24$130
Training Lead*US24$130
Training Materials DeveloperUS18$89
TrainerUS36$130
Business AnalystUS102$130
Solution ArchitectUS48$130
Development LeadUS24$130
DevelopersUS650$130
UI/UX DesignerUS17$130
Testing Lead*US24$130
TestersUS128$130
Data Conversion LeadUS24$130
Data Conversion AnalystUS64$130
Interface Lead*US24$130
Integration DeveloperUS62$130
Cloud/Devops EngineerUS24$130
Security AnalystUS24$174

Scope

modules, phases, deliverables
Modules
Not available in source data
Phases
Not available in source data
Deliverables
Not available in source data

Evidence

where each figure came from
Source fileDC - OAG - Child Support Enforcement System Replacement Project RFI - July 2026
Tab usedV2_Pricing Summary
Tabs in workbookRFP Schedule, RFP Summary, Scope of Work, Q&A, Budget, Other RFPs, V2_Pricing Summary, V2_Implementation Plan, V2_Software Pricing, Cost
File modified2026-07-10T06:05:50.934Z
Documents snapshotpropshop-archive/drive snapshot 2026-09-03
Extractor confidence
FieldConfidence
0h
1i
2g
3h
Fields the extractor could not find

non_opportunity_reasonlicense_valuethird_party_valuecounties_or_offices

Boilerplate clusters
  • templated assumptions (near-identical)
Extraction notes

Largest deal by total_contract_value in this shard ($46.1M), driven by a 650-FTE-month Developers line — plausible given a 24-month DDI on a legacy child-support-enforcement mainframe/VM replacement, but flagged for a sanity check given its outsized scale vs peer folders. Folder/file name says 'RFI' but tabs are 'V2_Pricing Summary' etc. (bid-style, versioned) with a real 'Total Contract Value' style grid, not a non-binding RFI cost estimate. jurisdiction_type recorded as 'state' for DC as the closest schema fit (DC is technically a federal district, not a state, but is treated as state-equivalent for procurement purposes here). || SYNTHESIS SANITY: role 'Developers' fte_months=650.0 exceeds the 400 threshold but was RETAINED — price(14196000) = fte_months x bill_rate(130.00) x stated hours_basis(168) reconciles to 1.000, so it is a genuine multi-FTE pooled row on a long programme.

RFP summary & assumptions

verbatim from the source

{"Purpose":"The Office of the Attorney General (OAG), Child Support Services Division (CSSD) is conducting market research through this Request for Information (RFI) to gather feedback from qualified vendors on the estimated cost and approach for replacing the District of Columbia Child Support Enforcement System (DCCSES).","Pricing":"The anticipated procurement will likely use a fixed-price, not-to-exceed contract, with payments tied to the successful delivery of working system functionality (e.g., Case Initiation, Locate, Establishment, Financials) rather than project documentation or traditional milestone completions.","Capability and Relevant Experience":"A brief overview of their organization's experience implementing Child Support Enforcement (CSE) systems.\nA list of relevant projects (including the state, project dates, implementation type, and a short description).\nA description of how their proposed solution reuses certified CSE systems, transfer system components, modules, integrations, or workflows to reduce cost, risk, and implementation effort.","User Base":"The current DCCSES production environment runs on a Microsoft Server 2022 Standard Edition virtual machine hosted on a Dell PowerEdge R730xd server. It supports approximately 250 users through a secure network and is configured with 128 GB RAM, 714 GB of allocated storage, and a RAID 10 disk configuration for performance and redundancy.","Hosting":null,"Time Line":null,"RFP Document Folder Link":null}

Assumptions
  • 1. Cardinality Solution will be hosted on AWS Gov Cloud for the production instance.
  • 2. AWS Hosting includes one production and five non-production instances - Development, Integration Testing, UAT, Staging and DR
  • 3. Cardinality SaaS license includes - Yearly 2 upgrades, monthly hot fixes and level 3 support
  • 4. All resources would be based out of the US
  • 5. The Cardinality Saas license cost is provided for up to upto 250 internal users, 5000 external users and 50,000 Citizen users
  • 6. Cardinality will leverage the Adobe or DocuSign licenses of the Agency for e-signature
  • 7. The Operations & Maintenance Support phase is assumed to start after DDI phase of 24 months followed by 3 months of warranty period
  • 8. Cardinality will provide a mobile responsive application. Development of a mobile app is not part of scope of work
  • 9. Cardinality will provideLevel-2 and Level-3 support during the M&O Phase
  • 10. The Agency will provide HelpDesk support during M&O Phase