Georgia SHINES Modularization May 2024
Identity & commercials
source facts| Jurisdiction | Georgia |
| Jurisdiction type | state |
| Agency | Georgia DHS / DFCS (SOR # Georgia DHS-20240501-01-CAI) |
| System | Georgia SHINES Modularization (CCWIS) |
| Domain | Child Welfare / CCWIS |
| Bid date | May 2024 |
| Basis | bid |
| Total contract value | $7,475,334 |
| DDI value | Not available in source data |
| M&O value | Not available in source data |
| DDI duration (months) | Not available in source data |
| Total term (months) | Not available in source data |
| Total person-months | Not available in source data |
| Effort basis | bid |
| Users | Not available in source data |
| Counties | Not available in source data |
| Prime | Not available in source data |
| Subcontractors | Virtus |
| Hosting | Not available in source data |
Documents in the Drive folder
4 files · snapshot| File | Type | Modified |
|---|---|---|
| Georgia SOR Shines Modularization May 2024 extractor source | pricing workbook | 2026-06-05 |
| Virtus Staffing Plan | pricing workbook | 2025-06-14 |
| GA CMM - Project Financials | pricing workbook | 2024-12-20 |
| GA-SOR Internal Plan - Jun'24 | pricing workbook | 2024-06-25 |
Staffing by role
0 rolesScope
modules, phases, deliverables- Login
- Intake
- Investigation
- Family Support Services
- Family Preservation
- Administration
- Reports
- {"name":"Completion of Training Documentation (M15/End of Roll-Out)","value":111882.6}
- {"name":"Completion of Vulnerability Test Reports (M15/End of Roll-Out)","value":61880.4}
- {"name":"Completion of Performance Test Reports (M15/End of Roll-Out)","value":75451.5}
- {"name":"Completion of Roll-Out & Stabilization / System Health Report (M15/End of Roll-Out)","value":813122.7}
Evidence
where each figure came from| Source file | Georgia SOR Shines Modularization May 2024 |
| Tab used | Final Ver SOR Milestone Pricing |
| Tabs in workbook | RFP Schedule, RFP Summary, Evaluation, V0 Implementation Plan, V1 Implementation with Virtus r, V1 Implem_with Virtus rates_Vir, Summary, Software Pricing, Glass Door - Atlanta Rates, Harsha - Working Sheet, Harsha - Working Sheet - V2, Harsha - Working Sheet With Gla, V1 Implementation_with Cardy ra, V1 Implementation_with Glassdoo, SOR Milestone Pricing, V1 SOR Milestone Pricing, Final Ver SOR Milestone Pricing, V1 Final Ver SOR Milestone Pric, Costing, Deliverables, Deliverables Based Pricing, Mapping, Burn Down Vs Payment Schedule, GA SOR Finance, M Vs D 160hrs, Sheet25, Sheet37 |
| File modified | 2026-06-05T06:49:41.913Z |
| Documents snapshot | propshop-archive/drive snapshot 2026-09-03 |
| Field | Confidence |
|---|---|
| 0 | l |
| 1 | o |
| 2 | w |
contract_term_monthscounties_or_officesddi_valueduration_months_ddiduration_months_molicense_valuemo_valuenon_opportunity_reasonprimesaas_valuethird_party_valuetotal_person_monthsuser_countuser_count_notevalue_by_yearwarranty_value
This 32-tab Gen-2 workbook has ~12 near-duplicate Implementation Plan variants and 4 Milestone Pricing variants with no tab self-marked as truly final (per recon.md); however 'Final Ver SOR Milestone Pricing' and 'V1 Final Ver SOR Milestone Pric' independently agree on the grand total ($7,475,334), so that was used as tab_used. The much smaller 'Summary' tab total ($2,305,655) is scoped only to a specific SaaS module ('Redetermination Notices & Appeal Mgmt') and is recorded as a variant, not the primary total. Milestone pricing shows a split 'Cardinality' $4,371,360 vs 'Virtus rate with MSP' $2,016,840 (a partial reconciliation of the $7.48M total; Virtus recorded as subcontractor/rate-card provider, not necessarily prime). Role-level staffing not extracted given the ~12 conflicting implementation-plan variants; hours_basis_per_month=160 taken from the 'M Vs D 160hrs' tab name and recon.md notes. RFP Summary tab contains an apparent copy-paste error (references a Minnesota DHS email address) — captured verbatim per instructions rather than corrected. Sibling files 'GA CMM - Project Financials' (actuals) and 'Virtus Staffing Plan' exist in the same folder but were not the chosen primary workbook.
RFP summary & assumptions
verbatim from the source{"Introduction":"Georgia Child Welfare's mission is to make sure children are safe and connected, and that families have the resources they need to stay together. In support of Georgia's most vulnerable population, we developed a case management application system, Georgia SHINES.","Scope of Work":"Case Management Application UI/UX Rewrite, Service Oriented Architecture Implementation, Database Optimization, and Report Development, Date Migration of the current data to the new database, Ongoing Data Sync from new database to the existing Oracle database, Case Management Application with online and offline capabilities, Case Management Mobile Application with offline capabilities","Minimum Qualifications":"A list of key personnel who will conduct the project, detailing their training, and relevant work experience...","Modules":"Login; Intake; Investigation; Family Support Services; Family Preservation; Administration; Reports","User Base":"NA","Methodology":"NA","Go-Live/Launch Timeline":"NA","Hosting":"Implement application using the latest version of the OMS Contractor Hosted environment (Cloud).","Legacy System":"NA","Data Migration":"Yes","Reporting & analytics":"Yes","Maintenance Support":"Yes","Submission Method":"Proposals should be submitted to it.procurement@state.mn.us... [NOTE: this line appears to be boilerplate copied from an unrelated Minnesota template]","Proposal Page Limit":"No limit","Initial Contract Term":"Implementation of the solution will occur within 12 - 18 months of execution of this SOW based on project plan.","Estimated Budget by State":"There is no limit to the total budget that Proposers may propose. DHS is interested to see Proposer's proposed cost for the Solution."}