| Source file | WA E&E Status Tracker Pricing Aug 2022 |
| Tab used | Option 1 - With Cardinality |
| Tabs in workbook | Option 1 - With Cardinality, Component Pricing, Option 2 - Without Cardinality |
| File modified | 2024-12-02T05:55:20.022Z |
| Documents snapshot | propshop-archive/drive snapshot 2026-09-03 |
Extractor confidence
| Field | Confidence |
|---|
| 0 | m |
| 1 | e |
| 2 | d |
| 3 | i |
| 4 | u |
| 5 | m |
Fields the extractor could not find
non_opportunity_reasonagencymo_valuewarranty_valuesaas_valuethird_party_valuevalue_by_yearduration_months_mocounties_or_officesprimehours_basis_per_month
Boilerplate clusters
Extraction notes
This is a Gen-1-style internal comparison workbook (title says 'Status Tracker', not a formal Pricing Summary): 'Option 1 - With Cardinality' vs 'Option 2 - Without Cardinality' compare DDI-only staffing labor cost for building the same E&E system with vs without the Cardinality platform (roles split between an unnamed 'Prime' company and 'Cardinality'). Staffing header found at row 58 via 'Resource Profile' match; no Hours/Month column present in this workbook (older/simpler layout) so hours_basis_per_month left null. No M&O phase, no RFP Summary tab, no named agency in-sheet (folder/file name only says 'WA E&E' generically). 'Component Pricing' tab (capability % scoring vs JJIS/CCWIS benchmarks) captured only as context, not as dollar figures.